What do you think?
Rate this book
Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine
The Christian church has a long tradition of systematic theology, that is, of studying biblical teaching on centrally important doctrines such as the Word of God, redemption, and Jesus Christ. Wayne Grudem's bestselling Systematic Theology has several distinctive Bibliographies in each chapter that cross-reference subjects to a wide range of other systematic theologies.
1291 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1994
About the author
Wayne Grudem
132 books295 followersWayne Grudem (PhD, University of Cambridge; DD, Westminster Theological Seminary) is research professor of theology and biblical studies at Phoenix Seminary, having previously taught for 20 years at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. Grudem earned his undergraduate degree at Harvard University, as well as an MDiv from Westminster Seminary. He is the former president of the Evangelical Theological Society, a cofounder and past president of the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, a member of the Translation Oversight Committee for the English Standard Version of the Bible, the general editor of the ESV Study Bible, and has published over 20 books, including Systematic Theology, Evangelical Feminism, Politics—According to the Bible, and Business for the Glory of God.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 424 reviews
April 20, 2016
Systematic theologies are not easy to rate. There are a number of factors to consider, especially when approaching a work the size and scope of Grudem’s. Plus, there are all sorts of personal criteria that come into play, the least of which is not one’s own theological positions. So, I’ll try to break down this review into a few categories and comment on the appeal of each to me.
Readability. This is where I consider Grudem to shine the brightest. Theological, like philosophical works, are notorious for their excessive verbiage and inaccessibility to the non-scholar. But this work was seemingly written with the layman in mind. The author takes pains to simply define his terms. He avoids technical words unless he explains their practical application to the topic at hand. And he follows an easily understood pattern: the biblical basis for the subject, his own interpretation of these texts, alternate views of the subject, and a defense of his position.
Applicability. Theory, no matter how biblically sound, is nothing more than an entertaining intellectual exercise if there is no real-life application to follow. I appreciate how Grudem points out why a particular doctrine is important and how one’s doctrinal position has ramifications for his life and ministry. An added bonus are the personal application questions at the end of each chapter, and an applicable hymn drawn from the rich annals of the historic orthodox Christian faith.
Theologically. What one thinks of Grudem’s theology is inevitably subjective. That is, it depends on how one views the Bible. I am a conservative, evangelical Christian, so I found the majority of this work very satisfying. Grudem’s approach is built upon the premise that the Bible (Old and New Testament) is the infallible Word of God and should be interpreted as God’s direct and complete communication to man.
I felt he dealt with the following subjects in a thorough and biblical manner: Atonement, Conversion (Faith and Repentance), Justification (Right Legal Standing Before God), The Church (Its Nature. Its Marks, and Its Purposes) and Worship. Also, his two chapters on spiritual gifts take a much needed balanced approach to a deeply divisive issue within the ranks of evangelicalism.
This work does assume a reformed theological position. Though I don’t agree with all of Grudem’s interpretations of the various biblical texts relating to election and reprobation, I will concede that he presents his arguments in a pleasantly non-confrontational manner.
Time Investment. This work definitely calls for a commitment of time. Not only is it long, but the chapters should be read and reflected upon to receive the greatest benefit. Also, if one is not familiar with the extensive biblical references, it would behoove the reader to take the extra time to look these up as he goes along.
This work is subtitled “An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine.” If this is your first dip into the systematic theological waters, it is a bit of an understatement. “An Introductory Immersion” might be a better description!
Readability. This is where I consider Grudem to shine the brightest. Theological, like philosophical works, are notorious for their excessive verbiage and inaccessibility to the non-scholar. But this work was seemingly written with the layman in mind. The author takes pains to simply define his terms. He avoids technical words unless he explains their practical application to the topic at hand. And he follows an easily understood pattern: the biblical basis for the subject, his own interpretation of these texts, alternate views of the subject, and a defense of his position.
Applicability. Theory, no matter how biblically sound, is nothing more than an entertaining intellectual exercise if there is no real-life application to follow. I appreciate how Grudem points out why a particular doctrine is important and how one’s doctrinal position has ramifications for his life and ministry. An added bonus are the personal application questions at the end of each chapter, and an applicable hymn drawn from the rich annals of the historic orthodox Christian faith.
Theologically. What one thinks of Grudem’s theology is inevitably subjective. That is, it depends on how one views the Bible. I am a conservative, evangelical Christian, so I found the majority of this work very satisfying. Grudem’s approach is built upon the premise that the Bible (Old and New Testament) is the infallible Word of God and should be interpreted as God’s direct and complete communication to man.
I felt he dealt with the following subjects in a thorough and biblical manner: Atonement, Conversion (Faith and Repentance), Justification (Right Legal Standing Before God), The Church (Its Nature. Its Marks, and Its Purposes) and Worship. Also, his two chapters on spiritual gifts take a much needed balanced approach to a deeply divisive issue within the ranks of evangelicalism.
This work does assume a reformed theological position. Though I don’t agree with all of Grudem’s interpretations of the various biblical texts relating to election and reprobation, I will concede that he presents his arguments in a pleasantly non-confrontational manner.
Time Investment. This work definitely calls for a commitment of time. Not only is it long, but the chapters should be read and reflected upon to receive the greatest benefit. Also, if one is not familiar with the extensive biblical references, it would behoove the reader to take the extra time to look these up as he goes along.
This work is subtitled “An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine.” If this is your first dip into the systematic theological waters, it is a bit of an understatement. “An Introductory Immersion” might be a better description!
August 31, 2019
Since this book is written by a Particular Baptist-Charismatic, it is not a Reformed systematic theology. It is, however, a systematic theology written from a perspective that is friendly to Reformed theology. For that reason alone, it is not a book that modern Reformed theologians and clergy can safely ignore. If I were to be crudely reductionist in summarising my views on the book, I would suggest that the first 75% is very good, while the remaining 25% is perhaps not so good. This statement would need to be unpacked a little in order for you to understand what I am getting at.
The author's positions on theology proper, Christology, Trinitarianism, and soteriology are generally orthodox and very clearly presented. The only exceptions to this general point (at least, the only one which I came across) was his tentative rejection of the Westminster Confession's teaching on divine impassibility and his affirmation of the Eternal Subordination of the Son. The first position is problematic because if God can suffer then God cannot be immutable. The second position is mistaken and should be abandoned in favour of the idea that Christ submits to the Father in his economic role as mediator of the covenant of grace.
Dr Grudem's views on church government, baptism, worship, charismatic gifts, and the millennium are probably what has earned him most criticism from his Reformed readership. I actually thought he came fairly close to Presbyterianism in his chapter on ecclesiology, and his work is useful for refuting prelacy in one congregation, i.e. single elder rule.
The chapter on baptism was fairly weak both in argumentation and in his understanding of the Reformed position, and he only interacts with Louis Berkhof and Michael Green (the latter is an Evangelical Anglican author). It is interesting to note that earlier in the book he claims that Christians can expect to see their children who die in infancy in heaven owing to the special promises of God to the children of believers. I find it odd that we can expect to see our children in heaven because God has promised to be a God unto us and our children after us, but we are forbidden from regarding them as members of the visible church!
The two chapters on charismatic gifts are probably the most controversial in the book, though it is not necessarily a bad thing for Reformed people to read these as Dr Grudem does overturn some weak cessationist arguments. It is also helpful to have a sober defence of this position if only to spare us from resorting to crude caricatures of all charismatics.
I will finish the review by focusing on the book's major strengths:
1) It is very well-written and clearly organised. Despite its length, the book generally does not feel bloated.
2) It has a devotional tone, which is usually missing from works of systematic theology.
3) Dr Grudem comes across as humble and is respectful to others.
4) The bibliographies at the end of each chapter are helpful.
5) It helps you to keep up-to-date with trends in broad evangelicalism.
6) It would make a good text-book for theology students, though it would need to be supplemented with more overtly Reformed reading material.
In short, the book was a valiant effort and will endure as a major work of systematic theology.
The author's positions on theology proper, Christology, Trinitarianism, and soteriology are generally orthodox and very clearly presented. The only exceptions to this general point (at least, the only one which I came across) was his tentative rejection of the Westminster Confession's teaching on divine impassibility and his affirmation of the Eternal Subordination of the Son. The first position is problematic because if God can suffer then God cannot be immutable. The second position is mistaken and should be abandoned in favour of the idea that Christ submits to the Father in his economic role as mediator of the covenant of grace.
Dr Grudem's views on church government, baptism, worship, charismatic gifts, and the millennium are probably what has earned him most criticism from his Reformed readership. I actually thought he came fairly close to Presbyterianism in his chapter on ecclesiology, and his work is useful for refuting prelacy in one congregation, i.e. single elder rule.
The chapter on baptism was fairly weak both in argumentation and in his understanding of the Reformed position, and he only interacts with Louis Berkhof and Michael Green (the latter is an Evangelical Anglican author). It is interesting to note that earlier in the book he claims that Christians can expect to see their children who die in infancy in heaven owing to the special promises of God to the children of believers. I find it odd that we can expect to see our children in heaven because God has promised to be a God unto us and our children after us, but we are forbidden from regarding them as members of the visible church!
The two chapters on charismatic gifts are probably the most controversial in the book, though it is not necessarily a bad thing for Reformed people to read these as Dr Grudem does overturn some weak cessationist arguments. It is also helpful to have a sober defence of this position if only to spare us from resorting to crude caricatures of all charismatics.
I will finish the review by focusing on the book's major strengths:
1) It is very well-written and clearly organised. Despite its length, the book generally does not feel bloated.
2) It has a devotional tone, which is usually missing from works of systematic theology.
3) Dr Grudem comes across as humble and is respectful to others.
4) The bibliographies at the end of each chapter are helpful.
5) It helps you to keep up-to-date with trends in broad evangelicalism.
6) It would make a good text-book for theology students, though it would need to be supplemented with more overtly Reformed reading material.
In short, the book was a valiant effort and will endure as a major work of systematic theology.
October 11, 2008
Widely praised in the insular evangelicalism tainted by a taste of modern Reformed thought, Grudem's Systematic Theology is a perfect evangelical circle-jerk, unafraid to be unaware of any currents of modern or historical thought. Relying mostly on evangelical systematics of the last 150 years, and, of course, on his own bent vision of Scripture, Grudem nevertheless assumes his work is timeless and objective.
Grudem defines systematic theology as any study that answers the question, "What does the whole Bible teach us today?" about any given topic." (21) This definition purposely abandons history and philosophy, redefining systematics as a subset of Biblical theology. But it certainly lacks no arrogance as it strides forward to grasp the Scripture and put it to the author's own use.
Systematic theology thus boils down to a sorting of relevant Biblical passages. Grudem's work is, of course, naive in what it ignores about the cultural placement of the reader and it is plain stupid in what it ignores about historical theology and the development of doctrine. Because he ignores church history, Scripture becomes God's one fixed action in history (Does it even replace Jesus?). He tries to claim that Scripture alone, not "conservative evangelical tradition," (he should add Reformed in between conservative and evangelical) is his norm, but that is an unreflective claim. It is obvious from his index that the thinkers he is interacting with are in a small circle of modern Anglo-American evangelicals (aside from well wishes to Calvin and a few other continental reformed types from before the 18th c. His reading also includes a couple of Catholic and Arminian straw men).
Systematic theology involves the reflection of the church in a particular age on the content of revelation and the previous history of the church's thought. It can be confident in its declaration, but also must be humble before the one who it attempts to speak about, treating God and his actions with awe. Theology is both scriptural and cultural, but the ultimate measure and center of the message is Jesus Christ, the incarnate word. The theology of today, interacts and is shaped by the theology of yesterday (that is the historical aspect here), but must be written fresh in every generation. Grudem's lack of any historical concern or awareness of his own placement in culture allows him to speak with assurance that is just not warranted.
Grudem's work is also often praised for being devotional, but that aspect does not derive from the text itself, but is added on in discrete devotional sections. Other theologians, including Barth, von Balthasar, and Bloesch, have led me to worship. Grudem, with his underlying polemical focus on the insipid quarrels of a corner of evangelicalism, only raises my ire. His division of theology and ethics, one about knowing and believing, the other about doing, entirely ignores the pastoral place of theology in the church's history (see Ellen Charry) and entirely separates the mind from the will. It also only further encourages the pronounced evangelical tendency to separate knowledge and faith from everyday life.
Evangelicals, every believer, need to know and do theology well. But Grudem does not encourage thought, he provides his own "timeless" answers. Overall, this is a horrible work that encourages intellectual arrogance and laziness, as well as historical amnesia. Its popularity is a blight upon evangelicalism and I cannot say enough bad things about it.
Grudem defines systematic theology as any study that answers the question, "What does the whole Bible teach us today?" about any given topic." (21) This definition purposely abandons history and philosophy, redefining systematics as a subset of Biblical theology. But it certainly lacks no arrogance as it strides forward to grasp the Scripture and put it to the author's own use.
Systematic theology thus boils down to a sorting of relevant Biblical passages. Grudem's work is, of course, naive in what it ignores about the cultural placement of the reader and it is plain stupid in what it ignores about historical theology and the development of doctrine. Because he ignores church history, Scripture becomes God's one fixed action in history (Does it even replace Jesus?). He tries to claim that Scripture alone, not "conservative evangelical tradition," (he should add Reformed in between conservative and evangelical) is his norm, but that is an unreflective claim. It is obvious from his index that the thinkers he is interacting with are in a small circle of modern Anglo-American evangelicals (aside from well wishes to Calvin and a few other continental reformed types from before the 18th c. His reading also includes a couple of Catholic and Arminian straw men).
Systematic theology involves the reflection of the church in a particular age on the content of revelation and the previous history of the church's thought. It can be confident in its declaration, but also must be humble before the one who it attempts to speak about, treating God and his actions with awe. Theology is both scriptural and cultural, but the ultimate measure and center of the message is Jesus Christ, the incarnate word. The theology of today, interacts and is shaped by the theology of yesterday (that is the historical aspect here), but must be written fresh in every generation. Grudem's lack of any historical concern or awareness of his own placement in culture allows him to speak with assurance that is just not warranted.
Grudem's work is also often praised for being devotional, but that aspect does not derive from the text itself, but is added on in discrete devotional sections. Other theologians, including Barth, von Balthasar, and Bloesch, have led me to worship. Grudem, with his underlying polemical focus on the insipid quarrels of a corner of evangelicalism, only raises my ire. His division of theology and ethics, one about knowing and believing, the other about doing, entirely ignores the pastoral place of theology in the church's history (see Ellen Charry) and entirely separates the mind from the will. It also only further encourages the pronounced evangelical tendency to separate knowledge and faith from everyday life.
Evangelicals, every believer, need to know and do theology well. But Grudem does not encourage thought, he provides his own "timeless" answers. Overall, this is a horrible work that encourages intellectual arrogance and laziness, as well as historical amnesia. Its popularity is a blight upon evangelicalism and I cannot say enough bad things about it.
November 7, 2012
Ehhhh... At one level, I get the hype... at another level, I have HUGE concerns. I am not sure really all what should or shouldn't be said about this work. Out the outset, Grudem is commendable on several levels. He is a first rate communicator. He is a great compiler and organizer. He's not afraid to take on controversial issues or draw unpopular conclusions. When it comes to logic, or at least structured theology, he is good and clearly communicates "tightly wound" argumentation without mentally exhausting his readers. He has a very high view of scripture. All of this volume good. YET... He is a scary guy. His sway in the evangelical world is alarming. This makes him powerful and this particular work (which has sold millions in various forms) a significant milestone in contemporary evangelicalism. It is one of - hands down - the best selling systematic theologies of all time, in the US and abroad. It has endorsements from all camps, baptists, presbyterians, charismatics, etc. Again, a widely praised, referenced, quoted, endorsed and recommended book.
My concerns mostly arise because of his non-historical views on key issues. His view of the Trinity is deficient, even if one grants a concession of a strictly western take on that issue. His Christology is deficient, especially in regards to his lack of adherence to counsels and creeds regarding the eternal procession of the Son (and YES, it does matter!). His view of gender(s) is deeply effected by his Trinitarianism... or maybe his Trinitarianism is too controlled by his view of genders. While I would agree with a lot of his final conclusions on gender, especially as it related to eclessiology, he does swing too far to the right and his theological *method* is defective. And yes, method matters - NOT just the conclusion. He is a (historical) premillennialist. Again, a view very much in vogue today - BUT a view that was condemned (several times) in the ecumenical counsels (Historical Theology DOES matter!) as well as by several creeds and confessions, within his own reformed tradition. He is a "wooden" Calvinist... He has a hard to swallow take on original sin - even if you only consider the western conservative/reformed traditions. And he is - for all intents and purposes - a strict determinist. His doctrine of Divine Sovereignty is almost Moslem-esque. Not the end of the world... I have had the opportunity to talk with and engage him over the years, he is personally very pastoral - but his disciples often are not - and turn his model of determinism into a form of science or thought experiment... Theology should comport with reality... it should be pastoral and drive us to meet people where they are at and help them walk with God. It may be my concern here isn't with Grudem as much as it is with his text in the hands of immature believers who claim to be his theological heirs. His view of congregationalism is interesting at best but truthfully, I find it when actually applied to produce more chaos and division (at a catholic level) than the alleged unity (locally) it is striving to produce. He's a baptist ;) Okay, not the end of the world, but, this much I will say - baptist theology is an aberration... and it needs be noted, that all versions of historic Christianity (Protestant, Roman or Orthodox), condemned all forms of baptist theology (not just Anabaptist! - they aren't the same) until a couple hundred years ago. Overall though... this is the text for the trendy, hipster, neo/pop-calvinist... And, in the end, I do get why. It is a handsome, well organized, well written book that has God and his workings in the world all figured out. Must be nice to be able to fit all that into a single volume.
My concerns mostly arise because of his non-historical views on key issues. His view of the Trinity is deficient, even if one grants a concession of a strictly western take on that issue. His Christology is deficient, especially in regards to his lack of adherence to counsels and creeds regarding the eternal procession of the Son (and YES, it does matter!). His view of gender(s) is deeply effected by his Trinitarianism... or maybe his Trinitarianism is too controlled by his view of genders. While I would agree with a lot of his final conclusions on gender, especially as it related to eclessiology, he does swing too far to the right and his theological *method* is defective. And yes, method matters - NOT just the conclusion. He is a (historical) premillennialist. Again, a view very much in vogue today - BUT a view that was condemned (several times) in the ecumenical counsels (Historical Theology DOES matter!) as well as by several creeds and confessions, within his own reformed tradition. He is a "wooden" Calvinist... He has a hard to swallow take on original sin - even if you only consider the western conservative/reformed traditions. And he is - for all intents and purposes - a strict determinist. His doctrine of Divine Sovereignty is almost Moslem-esque. Not the end of the world... I have had the opportunity to talk with and engage him over the years, he is personally very pastoral - but his disciples often are not - and turn his model of determinism into a form of science or thought experiment... Theology should comport with reality... it should be pastoral and drive us to meet people where they are at and help them walk with God. It may be my concern here isn't with Grudem as much as it is with his text in the hands of immature believers who claim to be his theological heirs. His view of congregationalism is interesting at best but truthfully, I find it when actually applied to produce more chaos and division (at a catholic level) than the alleged unity (locally) it is striving to produce. He's a baptist ;) Okay, not the end of the world, but, this much I will say - baptist theology is an aberration... and it needs be noted, that all versions of historic Christianity (Protestant, Roman or Orthodox), condemned all forms of baptist theology (not just Anabaptist! - they aren't the same) until a couple hundred years ago. Overall though... this is the text for the trendy, hipster, neo/pop-calvinist... And, in the end, I do get why. It is a handsome, well organized, well written book that has God and his workings in the world all figured out. Must be nice to be able to fit all that into a single volume.
November 26, 2022
Grudem's Systematic Theology is the "go-to" Systematic Theology in a large part of the American church today, including my little corner. I finally got through it myself, after delaying for years.
The book is very well organized, as others have said. Grudem is a clear writer, and the book is very accessible to the average layman. In fact, the book is organized well to be used in adult Sunday School curriculum, as my church is doing. The title is "An Introduction to..." so keep that in mind. The book covers a very wide range of topics, but does not do so in great depth in many places.
It is easy to understand why this has become the de-facto Systematics today. Grudem has a relatively high view of Scripture, is wishy-washy on six-day creation, has a strong emphasis on justification by faith, and is open-minded to the intrigue of Pentecostalism--but in a very conservative way. What wouldn't the contemporary Reformed church like about any of that?
Much of this is good. Grudem is at his best defending the authority and inerrancy of Scripture--perhaps the most important of doctrines. Yet this isn't enough, as it is clear that zeitgeist of "Scientism" has an undue influence in his reading of Genesis.
Most of the central Reformed doctrines are well articulated and well defended. My favorite and most impressive part of the book is his demolition of the paedobaptist view in chapter 49. I've never read such a convincing and concise destruction of the argument for infant baptism. Yet in the next chapter on the Lord's Supper, he doesn't even ask the most basic of questions--what elements ought we partake in? Grape juice or wine? For a theologian like Grudem, who seems very thorough in so many other things, to overlook the juice vs. wine discussion is a huge oversight.
Grudem is solid on ecclesiology, pointing out that the Bible says far less about it than we like to think. So there is a lot of room for negotiation here, yet the Bible does seem to emphasize some specific things that should point us to a plurality of elders ruling the local church with the support of the full congregation.
The chapter on eschatology was by far the most disappointing chapter in the book. For a systematic theologian to basically rule out preterist readings of the New Testament, and then use the very texts that ought to be read preteristically as the arguments against preterism is simply bad scholarship. As a postmillennialist myself, I found his three arguments for postmillennialism just laughable. Grudem would do well to read a little more widely on preterism and postmillennialism.
All in all, the book is about what you would expect. It is mostly solid, though very introductory. Some good, a few great parts, a few bad parts, and one really bad chapter.
The book is very well organized, as others have said. Grudem is a clear writer, and the book is very accessible to the average layman. In fact, the book is organized well to be used in adult Sunday School curriculum, as my church is doing. The title is "An Introduction to..." so keep that in mind. The book covers a very wide range of topics, but does not do so in great depth in many places.
It is easy to understand why this has become the de-facto Systematics today. Grudem has a relatively high view of Scripture, is wishy-washy on six-day creation, has a strong emphasis on justification by faith, and is open-minded to the intrigue of Pentecostalism--but in a very conservative way. What wouldn't the contemporary Reformed church like about any of that?
Much of this is good. Grudem is at his best defending the authority and inerrancy of Scripture--perhaps the most important of doctrines. Yet this isn't enough, as it is clear that zeitgeist of "Scientism" has an undue influence in his reading of Genesis.
Most of the central Reformed doctrines are well articulated and well defended. My favorite and most impressive part of the book is his demolition of the paedobaptist view in chapter 49. I've never read such a convincing and concise destruction of the argument for infant baptism. Yet in the next chapter on the Lord's Supper, he doesn't even ask the most basic of questions--what elements ought we partake in? Grape juice or wine? For a theologian like Grudem, who seems very thorough in so many other things, to overlook the juice vs. wine discussion is a huge oversight.
Grudem is solid on ecclesiology, pointing out that the Bible says far less about it than we like to think. So there is a lot of room for negotiation here, yet the Bible does seem to emphasize some specific things that should point us to a plurality of elders ruling the local church with the support of the full congregation.
The chapter on eschatology was by far the most disappointing chapter in the book. For a systematic theologian to basically rule out preterist readings of the New Testament, and then use the very texts that ought to be read preteristically as the arguments against preterism is simply bad scholarship. As a postmillennialist myself, I found his three arguments for postmillennialism just laughable. Grudem would do well to read a little more widely on preterism and postmillennialism.
All in all, the book is about what you would expect. It is mostly solid, though very introductory. Some good, a few great parts, a few bad parts, and one really bad chapter.
January 8, 2021
I chose to read this book contiguously, which I wouldn't recommend to most people. I do however recommend every Christian get a copy of this book for referencing. I enjoyed the systematic approach to the theological topics and found Grudem's work to be thorough, consistent, and convincing. The author defended disputed positions well which gives the reader lots to consider. Finally, my recommendation to anyone who wants to use this book as an introduction to biblical doctrine: Read alongside community while thoroughly pondering and discussing the Questions for Personal Application.
January 2, 2016
Over the past couple of years, I made it a goal of mine to read through Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology. Grudem’s work is one of the standard systematic theology books used in Bible colleges and seminaries around the world. I read Millard Erickson’s book in my theology classes in seminary, and thus wanted to take a look at Grudem’s work. Over the next few paragraphs, I will mention just a few impressions of the work that I have. I will not attempt a thorough review, as to review a 1,200 page work is not a task I relish.
Positives
The first thing that I will applaud in Grudem’s work is the way in which he made his book accessible for readers of all different levels. While some of the concepts are necessarily difficult to mentally wade through, Grudem did extremely well in making this book readable. I do not remember many times in which I felt I had to reread a paragraph or sentence simply because the prose was difficult. Yes, sometimes the logic was difficult, but never the language. Grudem does not revel in using bigger words than his readers can easily digest.
Another positive of the book is its devotional nature. At the end of each chapter, Grudem offers questions for reflection, Scripture to memorize, and even an applicable hymn for the topic being discussed. This demonstrates for us that Grudem does not consider theology something to be reserved for sterile academia. On the contrary, Grudem helps us to see that to embrace theology should necessarily include a deep life of worship of the Creator.
I must also say, though it sound self-promoting, that I enjoyed reading a work that I could so readily agree with. As the author took us through doctrine after doctrine, I found myself so regularly thinking, “Yes, that is exactly what I think.” Of course this is not every concept on every page, but for the most part, I found myself easily able to point back to Grudem and to say to people that this is a good place to see why my doctrine is what it is.
Negatives
In any work of this size, it is impossible to agree with every concept or argument. There are some doctrines or definitions given where I believed that Grudem may have shot wide of the mark. This is a difficult thing to write, however, as I assume Grudem to be much brighter than me, and thus he is probably right while I need the correction. Without getting into the issues, Grudem’s definition of the New Testament gift of prophecy and his handling of cessationism vs. continuationism is an example where I do not quite find myself lining up with the author’s assessment. I will say, however, that reading Grudem here has made me commit to review my position on the topic and examine my own understanding.
Perhaps the strangest criticism of this book is that some chapters feel too short. Yes, this book is already enormous. Many people will never open its covers for the simple fact of the intimidating mass of the tome. However, some of the latter chapters of the book feel like cursory overviews. This is the downfall of a single volume systematic theology. The point is, however, that many who look to this book for a defining answer on difficult issues such as eschatology will only find a starting point with Grudem, but will have to look to other, more focused works to find a conclusion. No, this criticism is not fair when we consider the book’s purpose, but it is still something that a reader may sense as he or she works through the volume.
Recommendation
I would recommend that Christians of all walks of life take a shot at working through Grudem’s Systematic Theology. Yes, the book is huge. But, if you will give yourself to simply one chapter per week, in 57 weeks, just over 1 year, you will have worked through deep thinking on some of the most glorious things that a person can consider. I have no personal hesitation at all in calling Christians to look to Grudem’s work as a great starting place for understanding the things of the faith.
Positives
The first thing that I will applaud in Grudem’s work is the way in which he made his book accessible for readers of all different levels. While some of the concepts are necessarily difficult to mentally wade through, Grudem did extremely well in making this book readable. I do not remember many times in which I felt I had to reread a paragraph or sentence simply because the prose was difficult. Yes, sometimes the logic was difficult, but never the language. Grudem does not revel in using bigger words than his readers can easily digest.
Another positive of the book is its devotional nature. At the end of each chapter, Grudem offers questions for reflection, Scripture to memorize, and even an applicable hymn for the topic being discussed. This demonstrates for us that Grudem does not consider theology something to be reserved for sterile academia. On the contrary, Grudem helps us to see that to embrace theology should necessarily include a deep life of worship of the Creator.
I must also say, though it sound self-promoting, that I enjoyed reading a work that I could so readily agree with. As the author took us through doctrine after doctrine, I found myself so regularly thinking, “Yes, that is exactly what I think.” Of course this is not every concept on every page, but for the most part, I found myself easily able to point back to Grudem and to say to people that this is a good place to see why my doctrine is what it is.
Negatives
In any work of this size, it is impossible to agree with every concept or argument. There are some doctrines or definitions given where I believed that Grudem may have shot wide of the mark. This is a difficult thing to write, however, as I assume Grudem to be much brighter than me, and thus he is probably right while I need the correction. Without getting into the issues, Grudem’s definition of the New Testament gift of prophecy and his handling of cessationism vs. continuationism is an example where I do not quite find myself lining up with the author’s assessment. I will say, however, that reading Grudem here has made me commit to review my position on the topic and examine my own understanding.
Perhaps the strangest criticism of this book is that some chapters feel too short. Yes, this book is already enormous. Many people will never open its covers for the simple fact of the intimidating mass of the tome. However, some of the latter chapters of the book feel like cursory overviews. This is the downfall of a single volume systematic theology. The point is, however, that many who look to this book for a defining answer on difficult issues such as eschatology will only find a starting point with Grudem, but will have to look to other, more focused works to find a conclusion. No, this criticism is not fair when we consider the book’s purpose, but it is still something that a reader may sense as he or she works through the volume.
Recommendation
I would recommend that Christians of all walks of life take a shot at working through Grudem’s Systematic Theology. Yes, the book is huge. But, if you will give yourself to simply one chapter per week, in 57 weeks, just over 1 year, you will have worked through deep thinking on some of the most glorious things that a person can consider. I have no personal hesitation at all in calling Christians to look to Grudem’s work as a great starting place for understanding the things of the faith.
November 10, 2023
Took me almost a year to finish, but we did it! Grudem gets 4 stars for his wonderful organization of topics that make this book easy to study and reference for future theological questions. I agree with close to 95% of his arguments and appreciate the way he lays out the different viewpoints for each topic. However, his wayward doctrine on the Trinity among a few other things keeps this from getting 5 stars.
I will say, as a non-vocational working young adult who has never studied theology in a formal educational setting, reading through this book has had an enormous positive impact in my life, and my general understanding of theological topics has increased by several orders of magnitude. It’s tough to get through, but I would definitely recommend it to other Christians looking to grow in knowledge about the Bible.
I will say, as a non-vocational working young adult who has never studied theology in a formal educational setting, reading through this book has had an enormous positive impact in my life, and my general understanding of theological topics has increased by several orders of magnitude. It’s tough to get through, but I would definitely recommend it to other Christians looking to grow in knowledge about the Bible.
Read
November 7, 2023The experience of reading this book holds immense spiritual significance for me. I’ve seen my desire for knowledge change to pull me towards God in intimacy rather than push me away from Him with feelings of inadequacy. I still have lots of questions (shocker), but my perspective on them has changed. I guess what I’m trying to say is: after a year and a half of reading this I feel free to wonder and ask God things while believing that I’m still safe even when I don’t understand. I honestly didn’t realize that freedom was offered to me before, and I am thankful to enjoy it now :’)
October 18, 2022
Am excellent overview to reformed theology. While I didn't agree with everything laid out, I think it is a well laid out work that does it's due diligence in backing up it's claims in scripture, and definitely gets your wheels turning.
Read
May 17, 2013Well, it took me almost a year, but I finally finished reading this. After reflecting on it, I'm reminded of a man I interviewed who had earned a Master of Divinity. He warned others considering pursuing a similar degree that you don't go into serious theological study without being prepared to change your mind about things you've long believed about doctrine after weighing all the scriptural evidence. I remembered being surprised when he told me this was the most difficult part of earning his degree besides learning the original Hebrew and Greek.
I started reading this book under the assumption that my belief structure was largely sound, but prepared to maybe pull a few small thorns out of the paw of my mind. Talk about a rude awakening. My discomfort began at Chapter 16 on God's Providence, and that discomfort transitioned to full-out pain with Chapter 32: Election and Reprobation, which led me to many sleepless nights and a few weeks of waking misery. I'm still working through many of the implications of those chapters. Ripping out the roots of bad doctrine pulls up all the other bad theology attached to them, and it is a painful process. Other chapters were sort of bitter medicine, which left a bad taste in my mouth at first, but made me feel healthier over all for having consumed them. Others were pure joy, particularly the chapters on Prayer and Worship.
Those are my initial thoughts upon finishing this massive text. I may add more later on, but for now, I'll leave behind a quote that is fitting for reading a book like this: "The truth shall set you free, but first it will piss you off."
I started reading this book under the assumption that my belief structure was largely sound, but prepared to maybe pull a few small thorns out of the paw of my mind. Talk about a rude awakening. My discomfort began at Chapter 16 on God's Providence, and that discomfort transitioned to full-out pain with Chapter 32: Election and Reprobation, which led me to many sleepless nights and a few weeks of waking misery. I'm still working through many of the implications of those chapters. Ripping out the roots of bad doctrine pulls up all the other bad theology attached to them, and it is a painful process. Other chapters were sort of bitter medicine, which left a bad taste in my mouth at first, but made me feel healthier over all for having consumed them. Others were pure joy, particularly the chapters on Prayer and Worship.
Those are my initial thoughts upon finishing this massive text. I may add more later on, but for now, I'll leave behind a quote that is fitting for reading a book like this: "The truth shall set you free, but first it will piss you off."
April 24, 2018
One of the most helpful books I have ever read. A comprehensive systematic theology from a mostly reformed perspective that is an excellent and well-organized introduction to Biblical Christian beliefs and theology. I appreciated that Grudem as an author was upfront about his position on every topic he covered - he did not feign to be unbiased, instead clearly stating his own position and then providing ample bibliographies in each section from other authors with alternate viewpoints for the reader to follow up with as desired. As a writer, Grudem is clear and straightforward, providing just enough academic content (usually through footnotes) to assist the reader in understanding the topics he covers in the book.
November 12, 2023
An excellent overview of Christian theology. When I started it this year I was afraid it would read like a textbook and be difficult to follow, but Grudem has done a great job of explaining difficult topics in an easy-to-understand format. His descriptions of viewpoints he disagreed with were honest and he attempted to give the best arguments for them even as he disagreed with them. It forced me to really reckon with the reasons why I held certain theological viewpoints. Overall, I’d recommend this to anyone wanting to systematically think through what they believe. This will be an excellent reference for me in the future.
December 30, 2015
This was required reading for my college theology class. I liked about a third of it, found another third dry, and disagreed with the other third. For instance, he does not believe in six-day creation, but leans toward a day-age theory, which seems to me to be a bow to evolution. I wish he had included more studies of things like prophecy and symbolism in the Bible; he barely mentioned them, and yet the fulfilled prophecies from the old testament are some of the greatest wonders and miracles of the Bible. Another thing I did not quite like was his attitude of "if __ parable means A, it cannot mean anything else." To me, parables can be taken several ways; searching for a single coin out of ten could teach both the importance of a single soul in God's Kingdom and the blessings of perseverance.
In some places he was able to cut right to the point and say things quite profoundly. In others, he would oversimplify an argument, such as when he spoke of the Trinity. He basically said "we must take it on faith" and quoted a few verses...but there is so much symbolism in the old testament and so many other verses that could have backed up quite a logical argument for his point.
I have kept the book for reference purposes, but I would not recommend it to many people because without a large level of prior Bible knowledge it can be very confusing.
~Hannah
As an afterthought, I decided to add that my two favorite church luminaries are Matthew Henry and Charles Spurgeon. I feel that both of them exercised much more common sense and awareness of Bible history and verses than Grudem does. Added to that, they're positively exciting and inspiring. I am currently enjoying Henry's unedited commentary and Spurgeon's "Treasury of David".
In some places he was able to cut right to the point and say things quite profoundly. In others, he would oversimplify an argument, such as when he spoke of the Trinity. He basically said "we must take it on faith" and quoted a few verses...but there is so much symbolism in the old testament and so many other verses that could have backed up quite a logical argument for his point.
I have kept the book for reference purposes, but I would not recommend it to many people because without a large level of prior Bible knowledge it can be very confusing.
~Hannah
As an afterthought, I decided to add that my two favorite church luminaries are Matthew Henry and Charles Spurgeon. I feel that both of them exercised much more common sense and awareness of Bible history and verses than Grudem does. Added to that, they're positively exciting and inspiring. I am currently enjoying Henry's unedited commentary and Spurgeon's "Treasury of David".
November 25, 2013
Whether Grudem's attempt at constructing a Systematic Theology is useful to you or not depends entirely on what you're looking for.
If you're looking for a primer on theology, or even a contribution to the conversation on theology, then avoid this book like the plague. Grudem's Systematic is unabashedly biased, historically shallow, lacking in nuance, narrow in scope, and sparing in dialogue. Even in areas where you might happen to agree with Grudem, you'll still likely be frustrated by his reductionistic simplicity - especially in the way he "charitably" presents opposing positions - and his dogmatic approach.
If you largely agree with Grudem, reading this book will likely only give you a false confidence in the rightness of your beliefs. If you largely disagree with Grudem, his arguments are sufficiently feeble that you will likely not change your mind.
When taken as billed, an introduction to Biblical doctrine, Grudem's Systematic Theology cannot be denigrated enough. It is a tragic waste of paper, and will likely cause more harm than good. Millard Erickson's Systematic Theology comes from a similar theological perspective but is superior in nearly every possible way. Stanley Grenz is another example. In my opinion, his highly ecumenical approach makes him the best of the three, but your mileage may vary.
However, Grudem's saving grace is that his book serves as a fairly good primer to the neo-Reformed movement. If you've ever found yourself wondering what's up with all these people who call themselves Calvinists even though they don't baptize infants, this book will give you a good introduction to what Grudem and his cohorts believe. It is for this reason that I give the book two stars, rather than one.
If you're looking for a primer on theology, or even a contribution to the conversation on theology, then avoid this book like the plague. Grudem's Systematic is unabashedly biased, historically shallow, lacking in nuance, narrow in scope, and sparing in dialogue. Even in areas where you might happen to agree with Grudem, you'll still likely be frustrated by his reductionistic simplicity - especially in the way he "charitably" presents opposing positions - and his dogmatic approach.
If you largely agree with Grudem, reading this book will likely only give you a false confidence in the rightness of your beliefs. If you largely disagree with Grudem, his arguments are sufficiently feeble that you will likely not change your mind.
When taken as billed, an introduction to Biblical doctrine, Grudem's Systematic Theology cannot be denigrated enough. It is a tragic waste of paper, and will likely cause more harm than good. Millard Erickson's Systematic Theology comes from a similar theological perspective but is superior in nearly every possible way. Stanley Grenz is another example. In my opinion, his highly ecumenical approach makes him the best of the three, but your mileage may vary.
However, Grudem's saving grace is that his book serves as a fairly good primer to the neo-Reformed movement. If you've ever found yourself wondering what's up with all these people who call themselves Calvinists even though they don't baptize infants, this book will give you a good introduction to what Grudem and his cohorts believe. It is for this reason that I give the book two stars, rather than one.
February 2, 2019
This is the worst large systematic I've ever read. Not the worst full stop as I think Bruce Milne's super basic systematic is even worse. But this was dry, it was lacking in content. Extremely shallow explanations of different views. If you're going to do a one-volume systematic you need to cover fewer issues so that you can actually cover them. Not cover everything extremely poorly. Accessing a "got questions" article for each of these topics would give you a more substantial understanding than reading this book. On top of these issues, it has an extreme lacking in the devotional aspect that a book about the things of God should have. Mind you, that is a problem with modern theology not just Grudem. All of this is not to say I disagree with him on what he wrote. Though I disagree with him on a number of key issues my gripes are mainly to do with the dryness of the content, the lack of devotional approach, and the sheer lack of depth to the dry and dead material that is in the book. Not worth the money. Buy Calvin's Institutes instead.
July 10, 2011
Wow. Grudem defines "Systematic Theology" as what the bible tells us today about any given topic.....and I have to say that after reading this massive text, I feel much more apt to be able to read and understand scripture and apply it to my life. The one major thing that sticks out in this book is the extensive bibliographies at the end of each chapter. Grudem doesn't just leave you hanging with his opinion, he shows you other texts where you can explore other opinions. This book should be required reading for Christians who are ready to move past reading the bible by itself, but want to learn more about biblical doctrine. (However, I should mention...one should always be immersed in scripture because no other book will grow your faith more than actual biblical text)
In short, my faith is different and better after reading this book. It will be on my bookshelf until I go to meet the Lord my God myself.
Now reading for a second time...... Started 01/16/2011
In short, my faith is different and better after reading this book. It will be on my bookshelf until I go to meet the Lord my God myself.
Now reading for a second time...... Started 01/16/2011
October 17, 2020
This work is an incredible resource for a few different reasons, and I will lay those out below. It was accessible, user friendly, pastoral, and applicable to all Christians in their walk. I could not recommend this work enough. The reasons why I love this resource are:
1) It’s a great reference resource. You don’t have to read the previous chapter to understand what is happening in the current one. Frame’s read more like a narrative making it hard to use as a quick reference tool.
2) Grudem does a fantastic job of defining terms.
3) The format is really well done, and it makes reading it very easy.
4) At the end of each chapter there are references, hymns, Scripture to memorize, and application questions.
5) Grudem does not shy away from critiquing views that he feels are unbiblical. He does so in a charitable and fair way. He does not create straw men arguments, but uses primary sources before critiquing.
I love this book and I’m glad I took the time to plow through it. I will admit that I was very ready to be done with it by the second to last section. This section focused primarily on the church, and I felt it not as significant as some of the other sections.
Compared to Frame’s, I must admit, that I’d recommend Frame’s over this one to read. This is a great resource to reference too, but it Frame’s is so much easier to read through and it is something that may be more accessible to a lay person looking to study systematic theology a bit more.
1) It’s a great reference resource. You don’t have to read the previous chapter to understand what is happening in the current one. Frame’s read more like a narrative making it hard to use as a quick reference tool.
2) Grudem does a fantastic job of defining terms.
3) The format is really well done, and it makes reading it very easy.
4) At the end of each chapter there are references, hymns, Scripture to memorize, and application questions.
5) Grudem does not shy away from critiquing views that he feels are unbiblical. He does so in a charitable and fair way. He does not create straw men arguments, but uses primary sources before critiquing.
I love this book and I’m glad I took the time to plow through it. I will admit that I was very ready to be done with it by the second to last section. This section focused primarily on the church, and I felt it not as significant as some of the other sections.
Compared to Frame’s, I must admit, that I’d recommend Frame’s over this one to read. This is a great resource to reference too, but it Frame’s is so much easier to read through and it is something that may be more accessible to a lay person looking to study systematic theology a bit more.
November 12, 2023
that was a long book ngl
February 25, 2023
It took me quite a long time to finish reading this work—years! Despite my intermittent reading approach to this book, I enjoyed the simplicity of the author’s presentation. This book is probably the most understandable and comprehensive introduction to biblical, Christian theology. Grudem’s meticulous organization of the chapters and his effort to discuss the essential themes thoroughly is remarkable.
I recommend any student of the Bible, any Christian person who wants to take the faith seriously, after a complete and deeper study of the Bible itself, to start with this book when looking for additional reference material. This is a classic.
I also loved Grudem’s humility and his passion for the Word of God. He is not afraid to express his doubts and reservations; he also leaves ample room for God’s wisdom for topics that are not yet clear. Moreover, he included Bible verses for memorization at every chapter along with hymns and additional resources on systematic theology. He also attached various Articles of Faith and essential Creeds. This makes his book an all-rounded go-to work on introductory Christian theology.
However, if you are an advanced theology student and/or a Christian who knows his/her Bible thoroughly, you might find this work too easy and hence, boring, so I suggest you look for more advanced works.
Thank you, Wayne Grudem.
I recommend any student of the Bible, any Christian person who wants to take the faith seriously, after a complete and deeper study of the Bible itself, to start with this book when looking for additional reference material. This is a classic.
I also loved Grudem’s humility and his passion for the Word of God. He is not afraid to express his doubts and reservations; he also leaves ample room for God’s wisdom for topics that are not yet clear. Moreover, he included Bible verses for memorization at every chapter along with hymns and additional resources on systematic theology. He also attached various Articles of Faith and essential Creeds. This makes his book an all-rounded go-to work on introductory Christian theology.
However, if you are an advanced theology student and/or a Christian who knows his/her Bible thoroughly, you might find this work too easy and hence, boring, so I suggest you look for more advanced works.
Thank you, Wayne Grudem.
Shelved as 'paused-progress'
September 6, 2016 disclaimer: this isn't really a real "review" of this book. What I wrote was more like notes on first reactions to the text since a friend of mine had recently/was going through the book around the same time. It really was never meant as a well-crafted expression of my view(s) on the book, nor does it reflect a studious approach on my part in carefully endeavoring to fully understand every argument before offering a well thought out conclusion. So if you end up reading this, take it with a grain of salt ;), it's quite possible I misunderstood/missed explanations given in the book-- I was likely doing several different tasks at the same time as listening to this tome.
So far, I haven't come across any conclusions that I disagree with, but there have been more than a couple proof texts that the author uses (particularly in prayer, and miracles) that I believe are clearly used incorrectly and thus serve to devalue his conclusions. It really makes me nervous about other proof texts he used that I may not have been very familiar with-- not knowing if he used them incorrectly. But all in all I still think the book is very informative and worth going through.
hmm, his logic seems rather flawed in a lot of places... it's not that I can prove him wrong, but I don't think he has adequate support for the points that he makes. He's using a lot of, well because the Bible doesn't say that A is true, it means that A is false. which is a clear logical fallacy.
I don't understand why he thinks that the angels were definitely created in the seven days of creation. I mean they certainly could have been, but I'm unaware of scripture that specifies that they definitely were created during the seven days described at the beginning of Genesis.
He's attached to this notion that heaven is a part of our physical universe-- which I just don't think is supported in scripture. Could it be true? yes. Is it definitely so? no. He seems to think that just because there're things happening all around us that we can't see, it means everything that happens is part of our space time continuum. Could this be true? yes. Is it necessarily true? No. I happen to speculate (there isn't scriptural proof either way that I know of) that it's more accurate to say, we are a part of God's world, rather than God and all spiritual beings are a part of ours. I suppose the only support that comes to mind for this is when God says our world is as dust on his scales.
Also, I'm irritated that he uses one of the most highly debated texts and even more controversial interpretations of the texts, as his proof. Saying heaven is physical because New jerusalem comes down out of the sky is not at all good support-- because it is one of the most heatedly debated items that New Jerusalem is physical. Could it be? Yes. Is there reason to believe it may not be? Considering that it says in the same passage that the twelve apostles are the foundation for new Jerusalem, YES. Is this a good proof text, NO!
So far, I haven't come across any conclusions that I disagree with, but there have been more than a couple proof texts that the author uses (particularly in prayer, and miracles) that I believe are clearly used incorrectly and thus serve to devalue his conclusions. It really makes me nervous about other proof texts he used that I may not have been very familiar with-- not knowing if he used them incorrectly. But all in all I still think the book is very informative and worth going through.
hmm, his logic seems rather flawed in a lot of places... it's not that I can prove him wrong, but I don't think he has adequate support for the points that he makes. He's using a lot of, well because the Bible doesn't say that A is true, it means that A is false. which is a clear logical fallacy.
I don't understand why he thinks that the angels were definitely created in the seven days of creation. I mean they certainly could have been, but I'm unaware of scripture that specifies that they definitely were created during the seven days described at the beginning of Genesis.
He's attached to this notion that heaven is a part of our physical universe-- which I just don't think is supported in scripture. Could it be true? yes. Is it definitely so? no. He seems to think that just because there're things happening all around us that we can't see, it means everything that happens is part of our space time continuum. Could this be true? yes. Is it necessarily true? No. I happen to speculate (there isn't scriptural proof either way that I know of) that it's more accurate to say, we are a part of God's world, rather than God and all spiritual beings are a part of ours. I suppose the only support that comes to mind for this is when God says our world is as dust on his scales.
Also, I'm irritated that he uses one of the most highly debated texts and even more controversial interpretations of the texts, as his proof. Saying heaven is physical because New jerusalem comes down out of the sky is not at all good support-- because it is one of the most heatedly debated items that New Jerusalem is physical. Could it be? Yes. Is there reason to believe it may not be? Considering that it says in the same passage that the twelve apostles are the foundation for new Jerusalem, YES. Is this a good proof text, NO!
May 24, 2019
To me this is the most thorough, well written, doctrinal sound systematic theology book out there. I have tried reading a couple others in order to do academic writing, but this one stand above the rest. Grudem is concise yet thorough. He doesn't spend time on fluff, he gets right down to the point, which I appreciate in a book this length.
I read this from cover to cover and regret nothing. If you really want to know what you believe, not opinionated, this is the book for you!
I read this from cover to cover and regret nothing. If you really want to know what you believe, not opinionated, this is the book for you!
February 19, 2016
Don't agree with him everywhere but he got me started in systematic theology.
October 22, 2021
For I am not ashamed of Grudem's Systematic Theology, for in it is some quite good stuff.
So, this book is well known, and I've been aware of it for the last decade or so, but have held off reading it because of some of the trinitarian controversies back in the ancient past of 2016: Grudem has long promised a second edition, so I thought I'd hold out until that bad boy came out so I could read the book with any updates or corrections he felt the need to make. Reading this was a strange experience to describe. This book is sort of viewed as the gateway drug to a bunch of the theological perspectives I would hold to, so it felt kind of surreal to read it this far into my theological journey. In saying that, it is interesting to see the indirect influence of this book on so much of my thinking, as I found myself nodding in full agreement with exactly how he articulated much of what he said. In this, I realize that the 'Truly Reformed' (tm) kind of scoff at Grudem a bit. And to be completely fair, I did have a few #NowayWayne moments here and there along the way. But I think he's done a stellar job overall and will definitely be returning.
So, this book is well known, and I've been aware of it for the last decade or so, but have held off reading it because of some of the trinitarian controversies back in the ancient past of 2016: Grudem has long promised a second edition, so I thought I'd hold out until that bad boy came out so I could read the book with any updates or corrections he felt the need to make. Reading this was a strange experience to describe. This book is sort of viewed as the gateway drug to a bunch of the theological perspectives I would hold to, so it felt kind of surreal to read it this far into my theological journey. In saying that, it is interesting to see the indirect influence of this book on so much of my thinking, as I found myself nodding in full agreement with exactly how he articulated much of what he said. In this, I realize that the 'Truly Reformed' (tm) kind of scoff at Grudem a bit. And to be completely fair, I did have a few #NowayWayne moments here and there along the way. But I think he's done a stellar job overall and will definitely be returning.
September 21, 2022
Just don't.
June 23, 2022
This is definitely a feat to read, especially by yourself. Let us remember those who have DNFed after a valiant effort....
In all seriousness, this a great guide to (a) understanding what the heck systematic theology is (b) reading how the Bible supports (or refutes) different theological views and (c) a springboard for seeing sources that argue for other views on a given topic. This last feature might be what I love most about this. While Grudem does believe in one 'correct' interpretation of the Bible, he does a good job of presenting the opposing viewpoints and citing their own scriptural arguments. In a few places, he even references good books that go into further depth.
That being said, I personally feel like if you already are well versed in the Bible and have formed your own interpretations from reading it; a lot of this will either come across as redundant or won't change your mind. BUT it makes a great references and articulates a lot of complex ideas fairly well. If you are not used to, or otherwise loathe, reading academic texts, this isn't for you. However, if you want to learn what the Bible says about a lot of Christian doctrine/dogma, this is a useful resource. I do encourage going through it with someone, because there is a lot of information here and each chapter ends with discussion questions best done in a community.
The only complaint I have about this massive tome is the opening chapters 3-5 where he explains the authority of the Bible. I would have loved for Grudem to have gone into more depth on this, explaining why we can trust the Bible without using the Bible. While this wouldn't technically be 'systematic' theology, I think all of systematic theology hinges on this understanding; thus for his arguments to be firmly founded, we need a common understanding of the authority of scripture. I also would have loved for him to have compared the arguments for Biblical inerrancy with other texts with similar claims (such as the Quran and Book of Mormon). Then again, these are not systematic theological arguments, so perhaps this desire for more is unfounded and should be in other tomes.
Regardless, Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology is a good academic text to help walk you through issue you might be wondering "What does the Bible say about this?"
Note: this doesn't include political issues such as sexual identity, abortion, slavery, war, etc. It only includes the core beliefs and practices of Christianity (the Trinity, Scripture, Salvation, Sanctification, the Sacraments, Spiritual Gifts, Prophecy, etc.).
In all seriousness, this a great guide to (a) understanding what the heck systematic theology is (b) reading how the Bible supports (or refutes) different theological views and (c) a springboard for seeing sources that argue for other views on a given topic. This last feature might be what I love most about this. While Grudem does believe in one 'correct' interpretation of the Bible, he does a good job of presenting the opposing viewpoints and citing their own scriptural arguments. In a few places, he even references good books that go into further depth.
That being said, I personally feel like if you already are well versed in the Bible and have formed your own interpretations from reading it; a lot of this will either come across as redundant or won't change your mind. BUT it makes a great references and articulates a lot of complex ideas fairly well. If you are not used to, or otherwise loathe, reading academic texts, this isn't for you. However, if you want to learn what the Bible says about a lot of Christian doctrine/dogma, this is a useful resource. I do encourage going through it with someone, because there is a lot of information here and each chapter ends with discussion questions best done in a community.
The only complaint I have about this massive tome is the opening chapters 3-5 where he explains the authority of the Bible. I would have loved for Grudem to have gone into more depth on this, explaining why we can trust the Bible without using the Bible. While this wouldn't technically be 'systematic' theology, I think all of systematic theology hinges on this understanding; thus for his arguments to be firmly founded, we need a common understanding of the authority of scripture. I also would have loved for him to have compared the arguments for Biblical inerrancy with other texts with similar claims (such as the Quran and Book of Mormon). Then again, these are not systematic theological arguments, so perhaps this desire for more is unfounded and should be in other tomes.
Regardless, Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology is a good academic text to help walk you through issue you might be wondering "What does the Bible say about this?"
Note: this doesn't include political issues such as sexual identity, abortion, slavery, war, etc. It only includes the core beliefs and practices of Christianity (the Trinity, Scripture, Salvation, Sanctification, the Sacraments, Spiritual Gifts, Prophecy, etc.).
July 11, 2021
3.5 Stars
Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology has become the standard theology text within Evangelicalism. As can be expected, under the umbrella of Evangelicalism, this volume contains a rather eclectic mix of doctrinal convictions, and yet Grudem still manages to produce a synthesis of sorts.
There are many things in this book's favour, and it will be a valuable reference source going forward. Grudem explicitly attempts to ground his formulations in the biblical text, he is mostly very clear, he deals fairly and charitably with opposing views, in many places the applications are pastorally sensitive, and the appendix with creeds and theological statements is of great value.
I would still advocate that the serious student of theology not only rely on Grudem. This volume, despite its comprehensive nature and size, still has some drawbacks. Too much time is spent on Grudem's favoured peripheral issues (such as "descent into hell" and "fallible prophecy"). Despite Grudem's exegetical vigour, at times word studies are required to carry a burden to heavy to carry. In my opinion the greatest drawback is the book's general lack of engagement with church history and historical theology. This contributes to the lack, despite many helpful applications and its worshipful disposition, of reflection on metaphysical assumptions and sustained theological reflection which is so important in the task of systematic theology.
Still, this book is a useful one to have on the shelf, especially if one seeks a quick and fair survey of views in evangelicalism and how they are argued for, and as an example of how foundational our doctrine of Scripture is for our theology.
Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology has become the standard theology text within Evangelicalism. As can be expected, under the umbrella of Evangelicalism, this volume contains a rather eclectic mix of doctrinal convictions, and yet Grudem still manages to produce a synthesis of sorts.
There are many things in this book's favour, and it will be a valuable reference source going forward. Grudem explicitly attempts to ground his formulations in the biblical text, he is mostly very clear, he deals fairly and charitably with opposing views, in many places the applications are pastorally sensitive, and the appendix with creeds and theological statements is of great value.
I would still advocate that the serious student of theology not only rely on Grudem. This volume, despite its comprehensive nature and size, still has some drawbacks. Too much time is spent on Grudem's favoured peripheral issues (such as "descent into hell" and "fallible prophecy"). Despite Grudem's exegetical vigour, at times word studies are required to carry a burden to heavy to carry. In my opinion the greatest drawback is the book's general lack of engagement with church history and historical theology. This contributes to the lack, despite many helpful applications and its worshipful disposition, of reflection on metaphysical assumptions and sustained theological reflection which is so important in the task of systematic theology.
Still, this book is a useful one to have on the shelf, especially if one seeks a quick and fair survey of views in evangelicalism and how they are argued for, and as an example of how foundational our doctrine of Scripture is for our theology.
December 29, 2020
This was a pathetic read but I muscled through as it was one of the additional reading resources for a course I was studying at the time. I honestly expected as much given his position of soteriology (Calvinistic). the problem with this worldview is they put the cart before the horse (systematics became paramount rather than dove tailing in behind exegesis and biblical theology). I recently saw this clown also endorsed Trump for the US election. When are Christians going to learn to just but out of this kind of stuff as both Republicans and Democrats are heinously corrupt? If you enjoy reading the Bible through a Dispensational and 16th Century lens then this is for you. Unfortunately I do my hardest to try and go back to the 1st century to piece together the meaning of the NT... 1 out of 5 stars. Avoid at all costs.
December 28, 2012
Systematic Theology by Wayne Grudem illuminates the basic doctrines of Christianity. This reference book has seven major sections with chapters in each section. The information is rich, scholarly and detailed, but written in a style easy for a lay person to understand. I read all the way through it!
Grudem ends each chapter with the words to a hymn on the subject of the chapter. In picking hymns to relate to the Christian doctrines he “realized that the great hymns of the church throughout history have a doctrinal richness and breath that is still unequaled.”
This is a marvelous reference book for every Christian.
Grudem ends each chapter with the words to a hymn on the subject of the chapter. In picking hymns to relate to the Christian doctrines he “realized that the great hymns of the church throughout history have a doctrinal richness and breath that is still unequaled.”
This is a marvelous reference book for every Christian.
May 16, 2011
Grudem has produced an excellent work from a reformed, Calvinist perspective. Interestingly, many of my friends who are neither reformed nor Calvinist also view Grudem's Systematic Theology as a go-to work. It is surprisingly readable/accessible, even including questions for small group study. Truthfully, it is readable for junior high and up, although the sheer size of it may be too frightening!
Displaying 1 - 30 of 424 reviews